WOMAN BATTLING HER EX FOR TWO FROZEN EMBRYOS HE DOESN'T WANT HER USING

A Microsoft executive is battling her ex-husband over two frozen embryos from their marriage, following her infertility due to cancer treatment
Despite a written agreement, Honeyhline Heidemann's ex-husband opposes her using the embryos, citing her ability to handle more children
Jason Heidemann is concerned about his ex-wife's parenting skills given that she already has three kids; he is pushing for the embryos to remain in storage

A wealthy Microsoft executive is locked in a bitter dispute with her ex-husband who is refusing to let her use two frozen embryos the pair made when they were married.

Honeyhline Heidemann, 46, was diagnosed with stage 3 breast cancer in 2017 with chemotherapy treatment leaving her infertile.

Although she and her husband Jason, froze two embryos in 2015, after the couple divorced in 2018 Honeyhline was required to ask her former spouse, Jason Heidemann, 44, for permission if she wanted to use them.

The couple signed a written agreement stating the embryos would not be used without a court order or consent of both parties.

Honeyhline, who works for as a consultant for Microsoft, currently has three children, including a daughter born in 2016 that she shares with her ex-husband, another child through a donor embryo in 2021 and a third born last month.

But her ex believes she would not be able to cope with any additional kids, citing how she would be unfit to deal with any more.

In a Fairfax Circuit Court bench trial Jason Heidemann, who is an attorney-adviser for the U.S. International Trade Commission, took to the witness stand to reel off a host of incidents suggesting his ex-wife was already stretched looking after her three current children.

He described a series of disturbing incidents during which he felt his former wife had made poor parenting decisions, including two occasions when she had left her toddler in a parked car.

He also recounted an incident in 2017 when his ex-wife pulled out a knife after he had wanted to take their daughter to visit the girl's paternal grandmother.

Jason has argued the embryos should continue to remain in storage unless he and his former wife can agree on what should be done with them.

He also expressed no desire to co-parent any future children with Honeyhline who has agreed to absolve him of responsibility.

In court, Honeyhline said that she would prefer to be awarded both embryos, but also accepted the court could allow each ex-spouse to receive one.

'I don't really care about my insurance or anything like that, but I care about my embryos,' she testified, stressing how it was likely her only chance to have another biological child following her cancer battle.

'To me, you can't put a price on it,' she said in court. 'I would not have any other biological children without these embryos.'

Honeyhline attorney, Jason Zellman, has argued the embryos should be treated as property based on the 2018 settlement agreement both Heidemanns signed.

Jason’s attorney, Carrie Patterson, has argued the opposite rejecting the idea the embryos are property that can be split or even sold.

Judge Dontaè L. Bugg will now have to decide what will become of the Heidemanns' embryos with closing arguments scheduled for May 9.

2024-04-27T23:12:48Z dg43tfdfdgfd